Content and Community on the Grid Edge
Menu
  • The Community
    • Become a Member
    • Sign In
  • Decentralized Grid Magazine
    • Distributed Generation
    • Storage & EVs
    • Virtual Power
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Policy
    • Microgrids Now
    • Resource Library
  • Podcast
  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Sign In
Energy Changemakers
Become a Member
Decentralized Grid Magazine

How Regulation Creates Markets for Distributed Energy — And Why it Must

by Elisa Wood

distributed energy
Shutterstock.com
January 16, 2024
Share

Many businesses aren’t fond of government regulations; they see them as restrictive. However, distributed energy providers tend to view it differently because regulatory decisions can create markets for them.

Yes, it’s strange and often confuses newcomers. But then, the electric power industry doesn’t operate under normal business rules. Distributed energy companies must compete with utilities. And utilities own the playing field as investor-owned monopolies with a guaranteed rate of return, a status that gives them near-invincible market power.

Utilities can (and have) swatted away technologies that threaten to displace their infrastructure, leaving innovators with no path to the market. Aware of this problem, regulators sometimes step in and chisel out a piece of the utility business and open it to competition, or at least demand that the utility consider alternative technologies. To win the contract, the new technologies must prove they are better — cheaper, cleaner, or more reliable.

Our story, After We Ditch the Gas Pipes, What Then?, looks at one such practice. Called the non-pipeline alternative, it’s being pursued, or at least explored, in several states and a handful of cities. In this case, regulators are looking for technologies to ease homes and businesses away from natural gas use. The story examines where and how non-pipeline alternatives provide opportunities for distributed energy.

Non-wires alternatives are a predecessor to the pipeline approach. In this case, regulators require that utilities consider technologies, typically distributed energy resources, that allow them to delay or avoid the construction of conventional electrical infrastructure, like wires, poles, and substations. Arizona, California, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island and Washington are among the states that have used this approach.

Many other programs and incentives are underway in North America to help new energy technologies make inroads into the utility-dominated electric industry. We’ll be writing about them here. Be sure to catch these stories as we post them by signing up for our free newsletter.

The Electric Grid is No Longer a Natural Monopoly: California

The electric grid is no longer a natural monopoly and those who think so are “out of step with technical and commercial reality,” said a group of organizations who recently filed comments in the California Public Utilities Commission’s Future Grid Study.

Elisa Wood
electric grid is no longer a natural monopoly

What 2025 Holds for Distributed Energy

Trouble and promise seem to characterize what’s ahead for distributed energy. So how should we approach 2025?

Elisa Wood
ahead for distributed energy

Hey DOGE! What About Energy Efficiency?

The Trump administration’s DOGE says it’s about efficiency, but apparently not energy efficiency.

Elisa Wood
energy efficiency
Let's Create a Decentralized Grid
Become an energy changemaker!
Click Here to Become a Member
Energy Changemakers
Wood Energy Writers LLC
600 Twentyninth Place Ct #1055
Charlottesville, VA 22901
elisa@energychangemakers.com
© Wood Energy Writers LLC. All rights reserved.
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy